Annie get your gun

TOP 10 REASONS WHY SOME MEN FAVOR HANDGUNS OVER WOMEN

#10 – You can trade an old 44 for a new 22.
#9 – You can keep one handgun at home, and have another for when you’re on the road.
#8 – If you admire a friend’s handgun, and tell him so, he will probably let you try it out a few times.
#7 – Your Primary handgun doesn’t mind if you keep another handgun for a backup.
#6 – Your handgun will stay with you even if you run out of ammo.
#5 – A handgun doesn’t take up a lot of closet space.
#4 – Handguns function normally every day of the month.
#3 – A handgun doesn’t ask, “Do these new grips make me look fat?”
#2 – A handgun doesn’t mind if you go to sleep after you use it.
#1 – You can buy a silencer for a handgun!!


The US Supreme Court issued a landmark decision Thursday on the Second Amendment. It will be the first of many striking down unconstitutional ban on handguns, primarily in large cities.

Rights Boy has previously blogs on this subject here:
http://rightsboy.blogspot.com/2007/10/right-to-keep-and-bear-arms.html

Rights Boy's good friend Mr. Clean commented on the ruling on the Des Moines Register website.

I read this argument a couple of times that this decision 'won't change much.' That's true for this one decision in DC re: federal law only, but this will set up dominoes for NRA lawsuits in Chicago, Detroit and other cities and with unconstitutional bans.

This decision will change A LOT. No more nonsense about self-defense just being privy of militias or other civil authority (or criminals) You as a 'people' have a RIGHT to defend yourself, and the government's only interest should be to keep dangerous weapons out of the hands of felons and the gun-challenged.

In a truly free society, there is always the potential of danger lurking about. That's one of the prices of liberty. The government should NEVER infringe on constitutional rights in the name of security. The government is the one you need to be afraid of.

It never seems to get through to some people that the highest crime rates are where the strongest restrictions exist. And while Giuliani takes credit for lowering the crime rate in NY with gun bans, the fact is, violent crime went down statistically in ALL major cities in the 90s, even in cities with no restrictions, for a variety of reasons, and NY was right in the middle of the pack. There were NO extraordinary good results from the NY or DC gun restrictions. Just the opposite.

Here's another good reason to have a gun. Adrenalin-laced cops in paramilitary gear, kicking down doors in the middle of the night with no-knock raids, shooting the dog, shooting anything that moves. And then realize they are in the wrong street. Happens too frequently, and it's accelerating.

You ought to inventory the military gear showered on local police forces in the 15 years. You wouldn't recognize Barney Fife in Mayberry anymore. Dude looks like GI Joe now. And he doesn't need his one little bullet in his pocket anymore. He has an AK-47 and a bazooka.

TOP 10 REASONS WHY SOME WOMEN FAVOR HANDGUNS OVER MEN

#10 – Guns can be traded in.
#9 – You can shot the lazy lump on your couch.
#8 – If you have a rifle, the handgun won’t feel betrayed.
#7 - Handguns can actually compliment that new motorcycle.
#6 – A handgun doesn’t mind if you ask for directions.
#5 – A handgun doesn't smell of beer if you give it a night off.
#4 – No handgun would feel unloved if it had to sleep on the shelf for a week.
#3 – Handguns only cause drama when they are used on accident.
#2 – Handguns stay good looking for many years.
#1 – Handguns don’t hog the remote!!

Neither party reassures voters

Rights Boy’s good friend Mike Burgher was featured in this morning's From the Editor's Inbox on the Des Moines Register website. You can find his edited letter, along with a lively discussion from other readers, here. The unedited opinion follows.

It’s always interesting to add up and compare the potential cost of various programs proposed by the presidential candidates. It’s often very surprising, sometimes downright depressing.

Barak Obama gave an interview to the Wall Street Journal a couple of weeks ago outlining the Democratic economic platform. It must have been the worst news ever for Wall Street, small business, and even the middle class when you think it through. It included the expected “soak the rich” themes along with repealing Bush’s tax cuts.

Most economists estimate the cost of Obama’s proposals and promises - including $150 billion for green energy, $65B for expanded health insurance, $60B for infrastructure -to total $800 Billion and counting. He says it will be funded by repealing the tax cuts and increasing capital taxes.

The problem is Obama’s math doesn’t work. With everything else the same, repealing the cuts combined with his proposed tax increases won’t pay for his spending. Using his own model on who should pay more, one recent estimate showed his plan would result in up to a 40 percent personal income tax, a 52.2 percent combined income and payroll tax, a 28 percent capital-gains tax, a 40 percent dividends tax, and a 55 percent estate tax.

That’s not going to happen, and that means the middle class is going to get squeezed even further, with taxes disguised as usage fees, access fees, entrance fees, licenses and assessments.

Obama will also have to raise corporate and capital taxes which will styme business production, raise the cost of everything, and will directly affect your your compensation and take-home pay.

Now we look at the other side. What will McCain cost us? He would certainly cost less than Obama domestically, because McCain proposes very little, with almost no economic impact. He does have a new-found religion on global warming, but I don’t think even he knows what he’s proposing yet beyond $300M for new battery technology.

It’s McCain’s foreign policy that jumps out. Another 100 years in Iraq at current costs would be about $2.5 Trillion dollars and the loss of about 80,000 more brave troops.

And you wonder why so many people feel totally disenfranchised by both political parties.

Iowa Flood of '08

IOWA Flood of '08

Survival Kit

Toilet Paper.......................................................check

Bud Light..........................................................check

Keystone Ice.......................................................check

Budweiser..........................................................check

Red Dog............................................................check

Misc. other bottles of alcohol....................................check

Piece of plywood to float your lady and booze on.....double-check

What role has race and sex played in the election?

Rights Boy’s good friend Mike Burgher opined about the role of race and sex in the election in yesterday morning’s Des Moines Sunday Register. Since the letter was submitted, Hillary Clinton has thrown her support to Barak Obama, so the Register edited the letter to discussing the race issue only.

Please don't read this and then invite Mike or Rights Boy to speak at your KKK rally or the next burn-your-bra bonfire. It's my opinion that charges of racism and sexism in this election serve no purpose but to distract voters with short memories from looking at real issues.

You can find his edited letter, along with comments from other readers, here.The unedited opinion follows.
___________

It was hard to follow the twisted logic in Leonard Pitts’ article “Let’s face up to the ugly Truth,” but I think he was concluding that a black person voting for Obama wasn’t racist, but a white person voting for Hillary probably was.

Pitts’ victim argument - that white and black people aren’t equivalent, the white man always keeps the black man down, blacks are “owed” – is so old and tired. But it somehow leads him to declare that even questioning race-based entitlements is automatically off-topic and not to be taken seriously.

Pitts claims that blacks have never had a choice but to support white candidates and implies that white voters somehow owe black candidates a ‘favor.’ I assume Pitts dismisses the viability of former candidates Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, and ironically forgot that when the Clinton camp made a similar gaff it was skewered as racist.

The race in the Democratic Party circus is historic this year. The sideshow includes the wooing of uncommitted super delegates as well as a game of musical chairs by Florida and Michigan. But the big tent includes a historic race between two viable candidates – a white woman and a black man.

What measure shall we use to determine the next leader of the free world? What are the important qualifications? So far, we have examined Hillary’s hair, cleavage, pantsuits, tears and her choice of ice cream. We’ve looked at Obama’s lapel, his family tree, dance moves and his church. Now pundits like Pitts are saying everything comes down to one issue, race, and white people won’t vote for a black man. I guess he’s confused on what happened in Iowa and many other states earlier this year.

People vote for candidates for many reasons. During the Iowa primaries, an 85-year old black woman was quoted in the Register declaring, “I’m voting for Obama no matter what. I want to live to see a black man run the White House.” A white female friend of mine recently made a similar comment about Hillary and living to see a woman running the US government. Another black friend said that he was for Obama because it “just sent the right message to the world.” None of these people are making a decision based on the issues. But I’m not sure they are necessarily racist or sexist. Are they?

Some people are so quick to call anything racist these days and an article like this just perpetuates the tactic.

Money money money by the pound

Rights Boy received the following email this morning. He has proudly made it to the prestigious mailing lists of the targeted few.

This is a sad story really. But Rights Boy isn't greedy. Does anyone else want to get in on this action?

___________________________

Dear Recipient,

How are you today and business in your country?

I am Shing Li, BankManager of bank of Overseas,Taiwan. I would respectfully request that you keep the contents of this mail confidential and respect the integrity of the information you come by as a result of this mail.

I contacted you independently of our investigation and no one isinformed of this communication.

A British Oil contractor with the Chinese Solid Minerals Corporation,Mr.Courtney Steven made a numbered time (Fixed) Deposit of$30,000,000.00 for twelve calendar months and not too long Mr.CourtneySteven died from an airplane crash.

We have launched an investigation into possible surviving next of kinto alert about the situation and also to claim his estate but in hisbio-data form, he listed no next of kin.

Please reply to my private for more datials Email: mr_shingli000@yahoo.com.twYours

Sincerely,

Mr. Shing Li.

Latest Odd Iowa News

Iowa is once again making the “News of the Weird” all over the world. Yes, it’s a wonderful place full or wondrous people.

Stretching a penny. A man was hit in the head by a train Saturday afternoon in Davenport as he reportedly tried to put a coin on the railroad tracks. He was struck by a ladder on a railcar near the end of the train.

Now in his young and exuberant childhood, even Rights Boy put a penny or two on the rails just to see what would happen. But the thing is, the trick works much better if you set it up before the train arrives.

Here, have one of mine. A man was arrested this week in Des Moines for throwing candy at a police officer. The cop was conducting a hit-and-run investigation at a convenience store when he noticed several M & M candies falling to the ground nearby. After finishing the investigation, he arrested Sean McGuire and charged him with assaulting a police officer.

McGuire was taken to Polk County Jail only after urinating all over the back of the squad car on the way.

Rights Boy remembers the good old days. If you threw some candy at a cop you would probably get your lights punched out. And if you whizzed in the patrol car, you would never be seen again.

On the other hand, Rights Boy wonders… What if you throw donuts at the cop…?

Third-best Elvis. Michael Reed has followed his dream – to mimic The King — and thought it would lead to a lucrative career. It didn’t. The self-proclaimed “third-best Elvis in the world,” has earned $5,000 annually with his gig, has a credit score of 250, and four credit cards with a total credit line of $24,500. So he decided to borrow $12,000 for plastic surgery in a last-ditch effort to make his dream solvent.

"Plastic surgery is not going to save a failing career," said Eugene Cherny, an Urbandale surgeon who altered Reed's face. "Nobody ever said that he'd look like Elvis. We never said we could make him a star."

Rights Boy is sympathetic. I’m just sure he’s a Hunka’ Hunka’ Burnin’ Love!

Water, water, everywhere. In March, it was reported that a vast array of pharmaceuticals - including antibiotics, anti-convulsants, mood stabilizers and sex hormones - have been found in the drinking water supplies. You can find that report here. This sparked a new panic and further switch to bottled water.

But in April, Des Moines was awarded the top spot on the list of Best Cities for Clean Drinking Water by Forbes magazine. “It's got a high-quality product, after all." according to the report.

Rights Boy is so confused. Bottled water is best last month, tap water is best this month. Drink eight glasses per day last year, that’s too much this year… Isn’t science wonderful?

New tourist attraction. Speaking of clean water, operators of Iowa livestock confinements could stockpile manure adjacent to homes and as close as 400 feet to Iowa waterways under a proposal in the Iowa House. The manure piles can be higher than 25 feet tall and half the length of a football field.

Rights Boy thinks it’s a great idea for a new tourist attraction. Come see the piles! Taller than your house and the size of Arena Football! See it! Smell it! Live it or live with it!

Come Join the Ban

The Iowa legislative session is finally coming to an end and thank goodness. Among the important legislation considered this round were lots of bans. Nanny bans. Stupid bans. Inconsistent bans.

Soda pop and candy were banned in middle and high schools during school hours. We need to limit our kids’ choices after all.

These same kids talk too much, so a ban on text messaging while driving was pushed.

To show our patriotism, Iowa State Representative Ray Zirkelbach introduced a ban on foreign-made flags. Good luck finding ones made in the USA!

We are banned from raising mixed wild/domestic hybrid cats, so keep your pumas and mountain lions to themselves.

We are civilized, so a ban on mixed martial arts, cage-fighting, was introduced.

Witnessing a dog fight or cock fight was banned. "You don't just stumble across a dog fight,” says Josh Colvin with the Animal Rescue League of Iowa. Is that so? I’m looking outside, watching two neighbors’ dogs go at each others’ throat right now. I’m so illegal.

The legislature refused to lift a ban; self-imposed voluntary casino banishment. No Casino for you!

The crowning banning achievement by the legislature is Iowa’s new universal smoking ban. One year ago, they raised taxes on cigarettes by $1.00 per pack. Then the cigarette business went south, literally, and one-third of the tax revenue disappeared.

Now, after weeks of political wrangling, and all ‘for the kids,’ and for greater health of Iowa, we have a new statewide smoking ban. It is banned EVERYWHERE, except a couple of places. Like Casino floors, and hotels and motels, retail tobacco stores, private and semi-private rooms in care facilities, private clubs, limousines, outdoor areas, farm trackers and trucks, the Iowa Veterans Home, and your home.

I’m sure the bar and restaurant owners love this ban… Rural Iowa just dried up even more.

My favorite Iowa ban on the books: The sale of wild turkey bones. Bury those things when you boil off the carcass!

Carping about official state fish

Rights Boy’s good friend Mike Burgher opined about channel catfish in this morning’s Des Moines Register.

You can find his edited letter, along with comments from other readers, here.

The unedited opinion follows.

Another legislative session coming to an end, and no action on crowning my beloved channel catfish as the official state fish! Where is the justice?

The carp lobby has grown strong and become quite vocal this year. Even the walleye crowd, once considered an ally, has become a different kettle of fish.

This is one of the few things the Legislature can do that won’t cost the taxpayers a lot of money along the way. Oh, Brad Zaun, you express such outrage about your dinner; why aren’t you as concerned about mine?

Declare the channel cat as our State Fish!

Zaun, Raecker keep public informed

Rights Boy’s good friend Mike Burgher opined about his State Senator and Representative recently in the Urbandale Community Register. 100% of the reader comments support his opinion.

You can find his edited letter, along with comments from other readers, here.

The unedited opinion follows.

I would like to thank Senator Brad Zaun and Representative Scott Raecker for keeping their constituency so well-informed on the Iowa Legislature. Quite frequently, the Urbandale Community Register includes articles by Zaun and Raecker that discuss the important issues. They are always concise, intelligent and well thought out. They discuss both sides of the issues, and make very clear what Zaun's or Raecker's position is and why.

It’s so much better than receiving a glossy brochure from a Congressman that you never met, parroting phrases that you have heard a hundred times. If you would believe what is written by Congressman Boswell’s handlers, he’s already ended the war, stopped global warming and made it just a perfect place for everybody.

Thank you, Brad and Scott. I don’t always agree with your positions, but I respect them, and each time I read your articles it reminds me of why I proudly voted for both of you.

Now will one of you please consider running for Governor?

I remember 1969

I remember 1969.

I was a senior at North high school and looking forward to going to Drake University after graduation. We didn’t have any money, but my mother had taken a job at Drake so I could go to college. It was the greatest job benefit in the world; if you had a parent employed at Drake, you got to go there tuition-free.

The San Francisco ‘Summer of Love’ had occurred a couple years earlier, and every kid in Iowa wanted some of that. There were rumors about a big music festival coming to Woodstock, New York and we were all packing our bags getting ready to hitch-hike to the east coast. Rolling Stone was the hot new magazine and we talked about living in communes, growing our own food and saving Mother Earth.

The Viet Nam War was raging on endlessly and anti-war protests were everywhere. Minds were still stinging from the assassinations of Martin Luther King and Bobby Kennedy. Nixon was in the throes of his paranoia; he hated war-protesters, and invented the ‘War on Drugs’ to deflect public opinion away from his bad habit of erasing White House tapes. John and Mary Beth Tinker and Christopher Eckhardt started to wear black arm bands to school. That infuriated the Des Moines school administration and the kids were suspended. The U.S. Supreme Court soon gave the school administrators a lesson on the First Amendment and the meaning of free speech.

Women were burning their bras and men were burning their draft cards. My generation was rejecting everything and just having a tantrum and a screaming fit against American society.

Then seemingly from out of nowhere came the Drake University basketball team, tromping on everybody in the Missouri Valley Conference and almost every team in the NCAA Tournament. They made it to the Final Four that year, barely losing to UCLA by three points in a semi-final game. While they lost, they completely shut down legendary player Lew Alcindor, now Kareem Abdul-Jabber. Purdue beat North Carolina in the other semi-final and then Drake clobbered Carolina by 20 points in the consolation game to finish third. We couldn’t say we were number one, but we always felt that we were number one and one-half.

That team had some great ones - Al Williams, Dolph Pulliam, Willie McCarter, Don Draper, Gary Zeller, Willie Wise, Garry Odom, Rick Wanamaker and Ron Gwin. They were so fast and so much fun and exciting to watch! Coach Maury John was the very definition of basketball defense; it became known as the ‘belly-button’ defense. Several of the players were drafted by the NBA and McCarter and Wise went on to great careers. Dolph Pulliam is still a local hero after all these years, calling the Drake games and wearing that now famous blue leather jacket. The Drake program remained great for several years.

Many people attribute the demise of Drake basketball to the departure of Coach John, who left for Iowa State to coach his son John John. The Drake team had its last NCAA top-25 ranking 33 years ago, always lost to the Iowa state schools, and was a perpetual cellar-dweller in the MVC.


But this year was payback time. Drake beat down every Iowa team and every team in the MVC. After being picked to finish ninth out of ten teams, they won the MVC Conference and the Tournament. They had a 21-game winning streak, and set more records and firsts than any basketball team in Drake history.

These kids play with such skill and heart. And they are smart too! You don’t get to play sports at Drake and act like a bozo in the classroom. The combined GPA of the Drake team is one of the highest in the nation. Drake has higher ethical and academic standards for sports participation than most schools, and others would do well to emulate the Bulldogs in this area.

Dr. Tom Davis set this program back on a path to its old winning ways. Now Keno has taken it to new heights, named MVC Coach of the year in his first season, with a good shot to be the national NCAA Coach of the Year. I just loved watching Dr. Tom sitting in the stands this year, beaming with pride for his son and this team.

I never thought I’d see anything like this again in my life.

The Bulldogd lost in their first game in the NCAA tournament. A typical Drake game, they were down by 16 points in the second half, came back to force overtime, and lost by a devistating basket at the buzzer.


No matter what, this team has made all of us proud: Des Moines, the state of Iowa, and the whole Drake Nation. Here we go, Bulldogs, here we go!

Life, Liberty & Intellectual Property apparently Forever!

It’s no secret that Rights Boy believes in strong property rights. A recent opinion by his good friend Mike Burgher in the Des Moines Register drew a lot of discussion by online readers. You can read that article here:

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080306/OPINION04/803060354

There is clearly a huge misunderstanding by a few people on real property rights in America, the concept of Eminent Domain, and what ownership means. One young reader went so far as to proclaim, “The government owns all the land, it ‘grants’ who can occupy it, and it can take it ‘back’ whenever and for whatever purpose is deemed necessary.”

That idea isn’t capitalism or even socialism; it is a clear, succinct definition of Communism. It makes Rights Boy just shake his head, beat it against the wall, and wonder what kind of drivel is being taught in civics class today. John Locke, who coined the phrase “life, liberty and property,” would have pulled out his sword and poked our young reader pretty hard. Fortunately, many people do understand, and did poke him with their comments, some not very politely.


But today, Rights Boy wants to talk about intellectual property – who owns an idea, a concept, a process or a song. There is a huge difference between real property and intellectual property. But due to an ongoing campaign - by the Record Industry Association of America (RIAA,) book publishers, and the major movie studios in Hollywood (MPAA,) particularly Disney - this is also misunderstood by many people.

America’s Founders drew a clear distinction between real property and intellectual property. Real property was owned and could only be taken away through Eminent Domain. Intellectual property included no such protection. If someone came up with a good idea, he or she was granted a short time period to exclusively use, control and copy the idea. This is the definition of copyright. The person with the idea got a head start to make some money and profit from his or her concept and the intention was to spur on capitalism. After that short period, ideas went into the ‘public domain,’ after which anyone could use, copy or modify it however he or she wished.

The original period set by the founders was 14 years; 28 years in some limited cases. Today, copyright is granted for over 100 years, due to a lobbying effort and some large contributions from the RIAA to the back pocket of selected U.S. legislators. The length of a copyright has been increased over 20 times in the last 30 years. It is virtually perpetual now and soon nothing will ever again go into the public domain.

The RIAA has whined and cried for years that it has lost market share because its customers ‘steal’ the product. It has managed to convince its customers and the courts that theft of real property and copyright infringement is the same thing. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA,) originally intended to punish satellite dish customers from decrypting copyrighted broadcast material, has been abused and turned upside down onto its head.

The RIAA and MPAA have become nothing more than a litigation machine, lashing out and harassing and bullying their own customer base. Disney sends out thugs to daycare centers that have a hand-drawn picture of Mickey Mouse on the wall, threatening to sue somebody if it’s not removed or painted over. The Girl Scouts of America are harassed when a child dances the Macarena. Cab drivers can no longer play the radio because, God forbid, someone in the back seat will hear the music and not pay the RIAA a fee.

Today, the RIAA’s position is that one can be sued to the tune of several hundreds of thousands of dollars for taking music YOU OWN and simply copying it to your MP3 player or computer. It always settles for $3,000 to ‘teach us a lesson.’ It doesn’t want things to go to court because it becomes publically obvious how many innocent people get caught up in its John Doe, shot gun style of litigation.

The RIAA likens a CD to a piece of Waterford Chrystal, and has no respect for making a backup copy or any fair use. If your CD breaks, too bad; buy another one. The RIAA has kicked and screamed with every advancement of technology. It would prefer that you purchase the exact same music over and over; first on a vinyl record, then on eight-track, then on cassette, then on a CD. And now you get to pay to download a digital version of a song that you already own and paid for several times; complete with embedded ‘digital rights management’ that restricts what you can do with it.

Isn’t it sort of odd that the companies that make MP-3 players are the same ones that want to sue you for loading your music onto them?

The RIAA doesn’t discriminate who it rips-off. It takes advantage of the artists that turn over their copyrights to the industry as well as the customers that attempt to listen to the music.

The artist once known as “Prince” - then renamed an unpronounceable androgynous symbol, then “the artist formerly known as Prince,” and now “Prince” once again - in the midst of his identity crisis, puts it well. When he was part of the RIAA, his records had to go platinum before he saw a dime. Now that he is independent, his breakeven point is about 1,500 CDs and he starts making some money much earlier. This is as it should be. The RIAA adds very little value anymore.

Back in the day, when everyone listened to analog radio, the RIAA paid off radio stations with cash and drugs to influence the playlists. Now it punishes and sues those radio stations for playing the same music and not paying homage to the industry association.
As vinyl records became popular, there were often two outstanding songs on the record and the rest were crap. There was no way to sample music and simply purchase the cuts that you liked. Eventually, along comes Steve Jobs who negotiated with the RIAA to allow purchase and download of individual songs. But what a price! A $1.49 for a song is outrageous! Rights Boy believes in the free market and all, but there is NO competition in the record industry and they have us all by the gonads. It’s no wonder that kids download music and don’t care if it’s legal or not.

So what can you do about it?

Rights Boys does NOT encourage anyone to download copyrighted material that that you don’t already own on a CD or DVD. That is clearly illegal. There is no anonymity on the Internet anymore and you will eventually get caught and pay the consequences. Is it really worth the risk of paying $3,000 to listen to Madonna sing about being a Material Girl?

Don’t support the Record Industry by buying CDs with the RIAA symbol. Buy CDs from independent labels. Go to local concerts and buy CDs directly from the artists.

Rights Boy will never buy a CD again, nor purchase a song from iTunes. In his opinion, all the good music ended in the late 1970s anyway, when the disco era got us all bumping and grinding and shaking our grove thing.

Rights Boy has amassed a modest collection of music over the years, and a good friend left his CD collection at the Fortress of Rightitude while he’s taking a sabbatical on the west coast.

Guess what Rights Boy is doing with all that music? ;-)

He bought the fattest hard drive he could find and has spent the last three years ripping all of it to the drive. He has more unrestricted MP3 music than he can possibly listen to for the rest of time. Life is good. …And the RIAA sucks. …Someday it will be looked upon like a dinosaur hit by the meteor.

Until that day comes, just remember that a string of 1s and 0s has greater property rights protection than your own backyard. It is a crazy mixed up world…



What do think about the RIAA? Vote on the survey to the right, send me an email, or click on the little underlined comment thingy below.

AT&T. Your World. Delivered. …to the NSA.

The Democratic Congress finally had the gumption to stand up to President Bush on one of his pet projects; reading your emails and listening in on your phone conversations.

Well, a little gumption anyway. The President wanted complete amnesty for telecom companies for illegally delivering your private data to the White House. He’s been ranting about this for weeks; that we’re tying his hands on fighting terrorists if he can’t read your emails. Congress refused to comply with the amnesty, but then gave in somewhat. They are waffling on granting immunity, but will allow innocent people to defend themselves with classified data that the government already illegally collected.

Whoopee! But, I still smell a veto coming.

Does anyone even care about privacy laws anymore? Do you care that, yet once again, the Decider ignores a long-standing law? The privacy laws in the 1930’s were put into place precisely for this reason; to prevent a knee-jerk reaction and excuse by the government to invade your private communications.

And don’t think they just look at call records ‘if one party is outside the United States.’ Without actually listening to the conversation, it’s impossible to determine the origination and termination points based on phone numbers. So you’ve got to scan them all.

It’s a documented fact that the government has installed a server farm with a fiber-optic cable at the large AT&T installation in San Francisco. All calls, emails and text messages going over the Internet can be diverted, and perused later by the NSA.

I’ve no doubt that Dick Cheney is thinking about Rights Boy right now, what to do about his spilling the beans; disclosing national security secrets and all that.

You can read the report on the recent Congressional action at:
http://saveaccess.org/node/1865

As well as the position of Electronic Frontier Foundation, one of the few friends you have left on this issue, at:
http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2008/03/11

You can read about the government installation at AT&T at:
http://www.eff.org/cases/hepting

We are all about two steps away from getting water-boarded for keeping a secret.

What a Duffus!

The idiots are running the asylum, and we hardly ever notice.

Elliot Spitzer has proven once and for all that there are an endless number of dolts on both sides of the aisle.

Is there anything more hypocritical than prosecuting prostitution rings, then getting caught up in the same scheme?

Some people are already excusing his actions, victimless crime and all that. But he is Governor of New York and a former Attorney General, and he happened to break several federal laws.

-

And then trying to launder money through a bank? Even Rights Boy knows not to move his vast wealth around the banks, because somebody’s going to notice.

Oh well, Spitzer will join a long list of mug shots of corrupt government officials. Maybe he can share a jail cell with Larry Craig, Brad Olson, Mona Cunningham, Brian Gilbert and Archie Brooks. Oh, yea, that’s right. Brian walked and Archie is on his way.

Aren't we supposed to hold government officials to a higher standard?

-

Yea, I know; Rights Boy must live in a dream world.

Sex Hormones in the Drinking Water!

An AP report this morning talked about the all the medicines found in our drinking water, including sex hormones. You can read it at http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080310/D8VAJB480.html

I wondered what was happening to me, chasing the Rights Wife around all the time. And I'm not talking about one of your incredible shrinking rights here!

Well, I say, 'Bring it On!' Put sex hormones in the water like flouride! Might keep some of us away from the keyboard occasionally.

Friday Funnies

To heck with the Drake Bulldogs! Let’s talk about the true heroes today.

The pale-face four of the CIETC scandal managed to get their trial moved to Davenport, trying to get far enough away to find a jury that won’t convict then.

I don’t think it will work. I still have faith in Iowans that we’ll eventually throw these crooks in jail and throw away the key. Come on, where are the smiles in that picture?

And where is Archie Brooks? After receiving all those sexual favors from Mona, and writing all those check, he’s going to walk. He’s turning State’s evidence and squealing like a pig. But he’s not a pig. He’s a weasel.

Karl Rove and Alberto Gonzales seem to be in a race to be the highest-paid speaker after leaving this administration. Rove gets $40,000 for each engagement. Gonzales gets $30,000.


I’ve got to give it to ol’ Karl. He has a mind like Darth Vader and is smarter than most people in Congress or the White House. Rove is going to speaking in Iowa City soon, and I understand that there is quite a welcome planned. Watch for fireworks.

But Alberto Gonzales? He made John Ashcroft look like a man of the people. And John Ashcroft made Janet Reno look like a man of the people. Literally. But Alberto Gonzales was a complete disaster. He never understood anything about the law, he was a crappy manager, never took responsibility for anything, blamed everyone else for his ignorance and missteps, and made a nice lap dog for the President.


And that brings me to the Man!

I’m really starting to warm up to President Bush in his last year in office. He has lightened up, and seems to be looking forward to retirement. He’s making jokes daily. Like he’s never heard that gas is headed to $4 per gallon. That’s funny! I think he is counting the days just like the rest of us.

And I really love it when he shakes his groove thing!

What do you think? Leave me a comment and let me know YOUR opinion. And click on a …bla, bla, bla.

Have a great weekend everybody! Root for the Bulldogs when they take on Indiana State today at noon in the MVC tournament.