Showing posts with label privacy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label privacy. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

AT&T. Your World. Delivered. …to the NSA.

The Democratic Congress finally had the gumption to stand up to President Bush on one of his pet projects; reading your emails and listening in on your phone conversations.

Well, a little gumption anyway. The President wanted complete amnesty for telecom companies for illegally delivering your private data to the White House. He’s been ranting about this for weeks; that we’re tying his hands on fighting terrorists if he can’t read your emails. Congress refused to comply with the amnesty, but then gave in somewhat. They are waffling on granting immunity, but will allow innocent people to defend themselves with classified data that the government already illegally collected.

Whoopee! But, I still smell a veto coming.

Does anyone even care about privacy laws anymore? Do you care that, yet once again, the Decider ignores a long-standing law? The privacy laws in the 1930’s were put into place precisely for this reason; to prevent a knee-jerk reaction and excuse by the government to invade your private communications.

And don’t think they just look at call records ‘if one party is outside the United States.’ Without actually listening to the conversation, it’s impossible to determine the origination and termination points based on phone numbers. So you’ve got to scan them all.

It’s a documented fact that the government has installed a server farm with a fiber-optic cable at the large AT&T installation in San Francisco. All calls, emails and text messages going over the Internet can be diverted, and perused later by the NSA.

I’ve no doubt that Dick Cheney is thinking about Rights Boy right now, what to do about his spilling the beans; disclosing national security secrets and all that.

You can read the report on the recent Congressional action at:
http://saveaccess.org/node/1865

As well as the position of Electronic Frontier Foundation, one of the few friends you have left on this issue, at:
http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2008/03/11

You can read about the government installation at AT&T at:
http://www.eff.org/cases/hepting

We are all about two steps away from getting water-boarded for keeping a secret.

Thursday, January 3, 2008

A Look Back at 2007 - Part 1

"There are good days and there are bad days, and this is one of them."
-- Lawrence Welk

For the next few days, Rights Boys takes a look back at the assaults on our rights in 2007 from our nanny state, surveillance state, police state and of course the state of government stupidity.

NSA Spying

By the end of 2007 there were forty pending lawsuits against AT&T, Verizon, MCI, Sprint and other telephone companies, accusing them of violating the law and the privacy of their customers by collaborating with the National Security Agency (NSA) in its massive, illegal program to wiretap and data-mine Americans' communications. This has included the records and full content of the private domestic communications of millions of ordinary Americans. The President and the phone companies hid this information from Congress and the American people for at least six years.

These actions violate at least four major privacy laws that have protected Americans' privacy for over 30 years. The laws deliberately and specifically require telephone companies to safeguard the privacy of their customers’ communications, especially when the government seeks to access them.

Congress is currently considering legislation that would grant retroactive immunity to the telecom companies for the illegal actions

PATRIOT Act

Many provisions of the PATRIOT Act were scheduled to sunset on December 31, 2006, but were renewed and strengthened in March 2007. This increased the ability of the government to search telephone, email communications, medical, financial and other records and enhanced the discretion of law enforcement to detain anyone as a terrorism suspect.

RIAA vs. the People

By the end of 2007, the RIAA had sued over 20,000 of its customers for downloading music. Sending threatening ‘John Doe’ letters that contend hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines, the RIAA settles for $3000 with mostly frightened teenagers, thus avoiding court and any chance for due process. Not one penny goes to any artist.

In December, the RIAA’s latest position is that simply copying a CD that you own to your computer or iPod is illegal.

We are approaching an age of perpetual copyright where nothing will even again go into the public domain.

And now, your government at work… funny and sad

TSA watch list, Airport Security

Airport officials in Albany, N.Y., were red-faced because a fake bomb planted by U.S. government inspectors slipped through their security system. The fake bomb was included with carry-on luggage that also contained a bottle of water. Airport officials did, however, seize the bottle of water.

Political Correctness

A production of The Vagina Monologues in Tallahassee, Fla., was retitled The Hoohaa Monologues, after a woman complained the title was offensive. Meanwhile in Cross River, N.Y., a suburb of New York City , three honors students were kicked out of their high school for saying the word "vagina" during their own reading of The Vagina Monologues.

Saginaw State University in Michigan now forbids the telling of any jokes that may involve "race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, national origin, age, marital or familial status, color, height, weight, handicap or disability," reports the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. That place must be a laugh riot.

Don’t Mess with Texas

The State of Texas argued before the Supreme Court that a murderer who had been treated for schizophrenia – and defended himself at his trial wearing a purple cowboy suit and issuing subpoenas to Pope John Paul II, President John F. Kennedy and Jesus Christ -- is sane and should be executed.

Fiscal Responsibility

The State of Iowa sure got its money's worth when it hired a consulting firm to give advice on how to budget properly. The suggestions made by the firm A.T. Kearney ultimately saved the state government close to $3.1 million. The cost of the consultant? Well, $3.9 million.

In September, the Pentagon paid $998,798 US to a small South Carolina parts supplier for sending two 19-cent washers to Cape Canaveral.

The Ig Nobel Peace Prize, not to be confused with the bauble won by Al Gore, was awarded to the Air Force Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio. The lab was recognized for researching a chemical weapon, the so-called "gay bomb,” which “will make enemy soldiers become sexually irresistible to each other.”

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

What does privacy mean to you?

The definitive source for all human information, Wikipedia, defined privacy as “the ability of an individual or group to control the flow of information about themselves and thereby reveal themselves selectively…Privacy may be voluntarily sacrificed, normally in exchange for perceived benefits and very often with specific dangers and losses.”

Merriam-Webster is more succinct. Privacy is “the quality or state of being apart from company or observation…freedom from unauthorized intrusion, as in one's right to privacy.”

Not anymore…

Donald Kerr, principal deputy director of national intelligence, told the Senate Intelligence Committee that Americans can't expect to have privacy, because people give up so much information online already.

Kerr declared, "Protecting anonymity isn't a fight that can be won,” and privacy now means that “government and businesses properly safeguard people's private communications and financial information.”

I guess Kerr cannot see the difference between someone choosing to type info into a Google search query, verses the government sifting through one's private records and listening in on phone conversations without the proper warrants.

Our privacy rights are disappearing before our eyes. Between fears of terrorism, cameras and web cams everywhere, shared medical records, or Internet search engines that keep history for two years, there is no privacy. So just give up. And trust the government.

We are frogs in the cooking pot; the water is starting to boil and we don’t even notice.

Meanwhile, A US federal judge has ordered the White House to preserve computer backups of all its e-mail due to pending litigation over missing messages. Apparently the Bush administration has been deleting as much of its electronic history as possible. Some bureaucrat in the White House basement, bless his heart, still believes in privacy!

Monday, October 8, 2007

Your Papers, Old Man ?? Part 2

Last Friday, Rights Boy’s good friend Mike Burgher opined about a recent traffic safety checkpoint in the Urbandale Register. He lamented about the chipping away at privacy, due process and protection from unreasonable search, all in the name of education or security. He also questioned the purpose and goal of this event as well as the cost, suggesting that it was a huge waste of taxpayer dollars.

Several Register readers agreed with Mike; you can read the letter online with comments by other Des Moines Register readers here.

By some strange coincidence, at 2:30 Friday afternoon, the Central Iowa Traffic Safety Task Force released the results of the checkpoint. You can find a summary of the results here.

After advertising this event as “more about education than enforcement,” the results showed the true purpose - 192 vehicles were stopped and 179 citations were issued. Some of the citations were stunningly trivial, such as not enough air in a tire. If this had been truly about education, they would have issued more warnings instead of citations.

This whole thing has demonstrated to Rights Boy that we are one step closer to a Police State, right here in little ol’ Iowa. What kind of priority is it to pull 40 officers off the street, keep them from doing something useful, dress them up in SWAT gear, and without any probable cause, pull vehicles over and intimidate drivers. Many Register readers weighed in after the results were published. Read those comments here.


What a country! I feel so much safer now.

Friday, October 5, 2007

Where are your papers, old man ??

Rights Boy’s good friend Mike Burgher opines about a recent traffic safety checkpoint in the Urbandale Register this morning. You can read the letter below and online with comments by other Des Moines Register readers here.


On Sept. 21, eastbound traffic on Hickman Road was subjected to a "traffic safety checkpoint" with traffic reduced to one lane, drivers randomly stopped, vehicles inspected, and licenses and registrations examined.

It was pretty high-profile, too - collaboration between the Governor's Traffic Safety Bureau, Central Iowa Traffic Safety Task Force and Urbandale, Clive and Windsor Heights police departments.

While it is quite legal in Iowa to set up a checkpoint and stop citizens without cause, request their papers and inspect and search their cars, it still bothers me. It reminds me how easily today we accept without question the chipping away at privacy, due process, protection from unreasonable search to name a few - all in the name of education or security or terrorists or whatever.What was the purpose or goal of this event and how much did the whole thing cost? What were the expected outcomes and did the event achieve its objectives? Because from my perspective watching, it looked like a huge waste of taxpayer money and took valuable public safety personnel off the streets.

We have a great police department in Urbandale as I'm sure there are in the surrounding communities. But I think it has more important things to do. As far as the Traffic Safety Bureau and Traffic Safety Task Force - if this is what these groups spend their time dreaming up, they should be dismantled and save the taxpayers some money.